Lansley “Selective hearing’ on Health Bill listening exercise

UNISON, the UK’s largest union, today accused Health Secretary, Andrew

Lansley of selective hearing over his response to the NHS Future Forum’s (FF)

recommendations.

“Far from implementing the core recommendations on competition, the

Health Secretary is just ignoring the parts that he doesn’t wants to hear”,

warned Christina McAnea, UNISON’s Head of Health.

The NHS Future Forum announced today it is continuing its listening exercise,

but the union is calling on the Government not to just listen, but to take

action over fears raised by NHS staff, patients, health unions and the public.

Christina McAnea, went on to say:

“The Future Forum said that Monitor should not be an economic regulator and

its primary concern should be the quality of patient care. Andrew Lansley has

not adopted this recommendation and Monitor’s main objective is to enforce

competition law paving the way for privatisation.

“The Forum also recommended that the Bill should include reference to

promoting collaboration and co-operation in the NHS that is still sadly

missing from the Bill. The NHS benefits hugely from open sharing of ideas and

innovations adopting a ‘commercial confidentiality’ approach will be a major

step backwards for patients.”

Critically, the private patient income cap was not looked at by the Future

Forum, but its removal will lead to private patients jumping to the top of NHS

waiting lists. However, the FF lead, Professor Field, said that it should stay but

be reviewed.

Christina McAnea, said:

“The private patient income cap must stay. At a time when hospitals are

struggling to meet the Government’s demands for £20bn in so-called

efficiency savings, they will be sorely tempted to prioritise private paying

patients. It is vital that we preserve an NHS based on need not on ability to

pay.”

Ends