Collectively the LGPS is the largest pension fund in the UK worth billions of pounds. How our members' money is invested and how it is managed is crucial to delivering the pension benefits to UNISON members. Trade union representatives on LGPS funds are crucial to make sure the benefits are delivered and the funds are secure and well managed.
Governance of pension funds such as the LGPS would include the following:
This is against the background of general pressure from UNISON/GMB on the failure to implement the EU Directive 41/2003 Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision or IORP and to take into account the 2005 Occupational Pension Scheme Regulations (amended 2007).
Key issues
What is missing in the regulations that should enforced by the Directive?
UNISON believes the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) may be in breach of UK and European law
Despite the Department promising to reform the LGPS, the scheme appears to fail to conform to at least two articles in the European IORP Directive as well as disregarding elements of the Occupational Pension Schemes Regulations 2006.
The key contraventions relate to Articles 8 and 18 of the European IORP Directive and Occupational Pension Schemes Regulation 12, which cover separation of decision making and restrictions on scheme investments.
Under Article 8 of the Directive, government is required to separate LGPS funds from the sponsoring employer. However, the LGPS is typically controlled by a sub-committee of the administering authority, which is usually the scheme's largest sponsoring employer, meaning there is no distinction between the two entities.
Article 18 of the Directive requires investments are made in the best interests of members and in the event of a conflict of interest, the scheme must be able to demonstrate its ability to make decisions solely in favour of members. Unlike funded schemes in the private sector which are obliged to have member-nominated trustees, LGPS investment decisions are made by pension committees linked directly to the administering authority.
With such limited member representation and independence there is little room for autonomous decision making on behalf of LGPS members.
UNISON argues that the complete lack of separation between LGPS investment decision makers and the absence of independent control of funds means the scheme is operating outside the law. The union calls on government to act immediately to ensure the LGPS is run at arm's length from administering authorities and to provide appropriate member-nominated representation on decision-making boards.
UNISON has been campaigning for improved representation on the LGPS for the last two years, some progress has been made. The Department for Communities and Local Government, (DCLG) is currently consulting on new regulations that will have some effect on governance.
This seminar is being held to explore what the DCLG consultation is for and how far away the government is from creating statutory recognition rights for scheme members.
The seminar will have workshops on the key organising issues and on report on research undertaken by the national union on investments the LGPS authorities have made in private contractors, PFI programmes and Private Equity.
10.00am: Registration & Coffee
10.45am: Dave Prentis, General Secretary
11.15am: Hazel Blears, Secretary of State, DCLG (invited)
12.00noon: The current legal position of the scheme and solutions
Colin Meech - National Officer
1pm: Lunch - provided
1.45pm: Workshop: LGPS Investments in Privatisation
1.45pm: Workshop: The Campaign for Representation
3.00pm: Workshop: LGPS Investments in Privatisation
3.00pm: Workshop: The Campaign for Representation
4.00pm: Closing remarks and coffee
Capital stewardship programme
LGPS Newsletter 79
