|
|
||||||||||||
Features |
||||||||||||
|
Lower than expected college funding poses a severe threat to adult education and those who provide it. Cuts at the chalk faceA funding crisis in further education is undermining the government's once impressive agenda on adult learning - with the potential loss of 200,000 places on adult learning courses across the UK. The savage cost-cutting exercise currently under way is already having a two-pronged effect on many UNISON members, who are at risk of losing their jobs and, as adult learners, of having their courses taken away from them. Redundancies, cancelled courses or raised fees are in prospect at numerous FE colleges dealing with lower-than-expected funding allocations. And with an emphasis on provision for 14-19 year olds, the courses under the cosh - deemed "non-essential" - are primarily those aimed at adult learners. As the main union for support staff working in further education, UNISON has condemned the cuts as "flying in the face" of the government's own learning and skills agenda. A motion at the union's national delegate conference in June described the Learning and Skills Council as an"archetypal quango" with too little accountability in how it spends its £9bn budget. The union - whose members in the sector include technicians, caretakers, finance staff, security, nursery nurses and learning support staff - is urging its branches to lobby their MPs in a bid to reverse the government's new stance on adult learners. "There are a lot of redundancies taking place, with colleges saying that they have no choice and the funding is just not there," says assistant national officer Denise Bertuchi. "We are also concerned about the impact this will have on the community and the quality of life for adult learners. Further education covers such a wide area: anything from vocational training leading to NVQs to British Sign Language training, from computer and internet training to classes provided to prisoners - essentially, all adult learning, not specifically aimed at 16-18 year olds. "For example, further education classes are a very enriching part of the life of the elderly population - they enjoy it, it gives them a sense of purpose and achievement. But those courses will be the first to face the axe, because they are regarded as 'hobby' courses. And the loss of those courses really could have a long-term impact on mental health." Bertuchi's belief that the government is contradicting its original aspirations for adult learning is reflected in a parliamentary briefing from the Association of Colleges. This notes that the government declared a strong commitment to adult learning and skills in its very first year of office and launched a reform programme in 1999, which created learning and skills councils to take charge of its policies for post-16 education. But now, the association says, "the government's five-year strategy for children and learners makes it clear that the DfES has much higher priorities than adult learning for the rest of this decade." Those "higher priorities" are school reform, universities and childcare. And, its briefing adds, government funding for courses that do not meet those national priorities is being cut, even such courses contribute to local needs. This clash of priorities was given a somewhat comic confirmation when the national Learning and Skills Council blamed the funding shortfall on none other than Jamie Oliver, suggesting that extra funding for school meals and other school initiatives had left little scope for extra spending elsewhere. While this sounds like passing the buck, Bertuchi does have sympathy for the college principals themselves. "Funding has always been unstable in further education, and the methodology is labyrinthine," she says. "Bidding for allocations is quite a dogfight. Each college principal is faced with what the government and the council call a 'priority challenge'. Which means they have to continue to deliver the training essential to the 14-19 agenda, while cutting all the non-essential, the non-core training, which involves a lot of the adult learning. "This crisis was predicted more than a year ago," she adds. "Lobbies to Parliament in May 2004 and March 2005 warned of shortfalls. Even then, the allocations to colleges for 2005/06 were much less than expected." UNISON is working with other unions, the TUC and the Association of Colleges in lobbying the government about the funding crisis and its effects. Members are urged to sign the online petition at
Bertuchi is also keen for members to keep UNISON informed of the situation facing their colleges. They can do this by emailing education@unison.co.uk Story by Demetrios Matheou |
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||||